Jump to content

SUBWAY - Random Thoughts Topic


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 31.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It’s not like they didn’t try. The MTA’s predecessor agency, the New York City Transit Authority, tried to about 60 years ago…

https://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/IRT_Times_Square-Grand_Central_Shuttle

Scroll down to Section 5 for the details, including why it failed.

Edited by T to Dyre Avenue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MTA has an official page on Redbubble, random lol

 

https://www.redbubble.com/people/mta-ny/shop

 

 

There's some cool offerings on there but others are quite bland. Why would someone want to buy a basic T Shirt with only the sign of an random commuter rail station on it and nothing else :lol: The Jackets I see some B/O wearing with different bus models on it are pretty cool but those aren't available to the general public. I wonder why they never sell clothing with rolling stock on it, does it have to do the manufacturer of these vehicles owning the rights to the design or something?

Edited by trainfan22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Calvin said:

Finally. After the last interaction I had with one who didn’t even look up from her phone, this is a good change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Calvin said:

Passive way of getting them to retire/resign.... MTA's been trying to phase that position out for a good lil' minute now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2022 at 7:50 PM, texassubwayfan555 said:

Speaking of Patco and signals, why did the (MTA) never install ATC / cab signals on the subway unlike the rapid transit lines run by the CTA, MBTA, SEPTA, and others?

Same Reason they stopped painting the trains.

 

Money... time,,, resources...

 

If you think of a question of "why didn't the MTA do (insert thing here" Money is the answer about 90% of the time. the other roughly 10% is because someone else stopped them. Ether the politicians or the unions. 

 

We're kinda trying our damnedest to get a tracking system up and running in the environment we have to work with. 

 

Put it this way... in roughly two weeks... my grandmother will celebrate her 95th birthday... And we're still dealing with hardware built around the same time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kamen Rider said:

Same Reason they stopped painting the trains.

 

Money... time,,, resources...

 

If you think of a question of "why didn't the MTA do (insert thing here" Money is the answer about 90% of the time. the other roughly 10% is because someone else stopped them. Ether the politicians or the unions. 

 

We're kinda trying our damnedest to get a tracking system up and running in the environment we have to work with. 

 

Put it this way... in roughly two weeks... my grandmother will celebrate her 95th birthday... And we're still dealing with hardware built around the same time...

Exactly: think of why OPTÓ wasn’t implemented permanently on the (L) - unions prevented the loss of those train operator and conductor Jobs. Think of why the Sandy Repairs to the (L) were as botched as they were? Former “Prince Cuomo” didn’t want a full shutdown and thought the extensive work could be done with night and weekend closures.

why hasn’t CBTC started up yet throughout the system? Dinero! (Money) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, texassubwayfan555 said:

Do other systems not have problems with money?

Just look at the DC Metro system right now. The same problems plaguing it too. Funding and equipment problems. There’s a stopgap funding mechanism for this year only and then it’s the (MTA) scenario for them. The government has always funded airports and highways to the detriment of public commuter systems. Those who live in the metropolitan areas like Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, DC, and Atlanta and use the systems are pitted against the highway users who don’t normally use the transit system and who resent being taxed for services they don’t use. New Yorkers know the game now.Being told that they must pay congestion pricing fees to fund a system that they don’t use. There’s gotta be a fairer, more equitable solution to the problem plaguing transit systems in the cities. I don’t know how this gets solved except for direct government funding and that’s never happened before in the past. Money is the problem, period. It’s always been the problem even when the private companies ran the system. Perhaps the public school funding mechanism is the way forward. My opinion. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the Prince St interlocking, something has to give if the (W) gets cut again. It's either keep the (N) express, reroute the (N) via Lower Manhattan, or get rid of Express Bridge service on Broadway entirely. 

And I've said this before, (MTA) really screwed themselves demolishing or disconnecting parts of the subway that they REALLY need in todays day & age. The Culver Shuttle, The Nassau Tracks to Manhattan Bridge, the 3rd Av elevated (even leaving the structure with no stations or tracks), putting the false wall at 2nd Av when they can really add more (M) shuttle trains to 2nd Ave, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, texassubwayfan555 said:

Do other systems not have problems with money?

Nearly all, if not all, of them do. Whether it’s not receiving enough funding or completing spending money foolishly, I don’t think there’s a transit system that doesn’t have a problem with money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lawrence St said:

Regarding the Prince St interlocking, something has to give if the (W) gets cut again. It's either keep the (N) express, reroute the (N) via Lower Manhattan, or get rid of Express Bridge service on Broadway entirely. 

And I've said this before, (MTA) really screwed themselves demolishing or disconnecting parts of the subway that they REALLY need in todays day & age. The Culver Shuttle, The Nassau Tracks to Manhattan Bridge, the 3rd Av elevated (even leaving the structure with no stations or tracks), putting the false wall at 2nd Av when they can really add more (M) shuttle trains to 2nd Ave, etc.

Unfortunately the use of the Prince St interlocking will not cease unless the Broadway Line gets a drastic service cut or service enhancement, like a Manhattan Bridge closure. 6 Av closure, Broadway Line capacity has to get maxed out and if the Broadway side is closed, then no Broadway Express

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, darkstar8983 said:

Unfortunately the use of the Prince St interlocking will not cease unless the Broadway Line gets a drastic service cut or service enhancement, like a Manhattan Bridge closure. 6 Av closure, Broadway Line capacity has to get maxed out and if the Broadway side is closed, then no Broadway Express

With the amount of ridership Broadway has I just don’t think it’s feasible to have express service anymore. Not to mention the express only save 1-2 minutes, if any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Lawrence St said:

With the amount of ridership Broadway has I just don’t think it’s feasible to have express service anymore. Not to mention the express only save 1-2 minutes, if any.

The express service is really for the Manhattan Bridge and the demand for Manhattan Bridge service is too high compared to Lower Manhattan, and since the express tracks feed to the bridge…there you go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2022 at 6:48 AM, darkstar8983 said:

Ehhh not 100% true, because then why would the DOT have condensed the BQE to two lanes in both directions ar the promenade to “extend the useful life” of the highway instead of starting a highway replacement project. I would do a highway tunnel under 3 Av that starts from the Gowanus straight to Tillary St, and keeping the promenade section as 2 lanes because of the reduced demand for the scenic route and higher demand for direct Brooklyn/Queens flow. Those going to manhattan and don’t want the scenic route can use the Battery Tunnel since by then congestion pricing will have leveled out the pricing tolls on all crossings between Queen/Brooklyn and Manhattan 

The reduction of the BQE from six lanes to four is more of a maintenance issue than anything else. And it appears that the City now wants to reopen the two closed lanes to traffic, plus possibly add a shoulder lane in both directions, which would indeed be a widening - https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/12/13/city-may-restore-bqe-to-six-full-lanes-of-nastiness-sources-say/

Personally, I liked Scott Stringer’s proposal to restrict the BQE to just trucks on the lower level with a park on the upper level in the Heights while decking over the roadway in Carroll Gardens and Cobble Hill with a park. Though I’d like to include express buses on the truck-only BQE combine that with expanded (G) and extended (J) service into South Brooklyn as alternatives to driving in cars on the BQE. Stringer’s proposal, interestingly is still on the Comptroller’s website, even though Stringer isn’t Comptroller anymore - https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/comptroller-stringer-proposes-new-vision-for-bqe-reconstruction/

 

On 12/12/2022 at 10:15 AM, Lawrence St said:

With the amount of ridership Broadway has I just don’t think it’s feasible to have express service anymore. Not to mention the express only save 1-2 minutes, if any.

So you’d want to kneecap (N)(Q) and (R) service by forcing all three of them onto the local tracks between Prince and 57th? And you’d still have delays at Prince and 57th, because trains would need to be split between the bridge and the tunnel at Prince and at 57th between Queens and 2nd Ave. 

Broadway is too popular of a route in Queens and South Brooklyn, so you can’t fit all of its branches on just the local tracks without substantially reducing service to each branch.

Edited by T to Dyre Avenue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the meaning of "line up" in the subway system? I looked up the meaning and found a general definition relating to directional orientation, e.g., northbound, or southbound, but what does it mean in relation to our system? I've heard conductors asking their partners, "Do you have the line up?" before moving out of the terminal, followed by a sequence of buzzers. Is it something related to the governance of movement? Maybe it's asked at times when the the exiting homeball is out of the conductor's field of vision, preventing them from closing up as they don't know if the train can proceed to the next station? I've wondered about this for awhile. Thanks for any clarifications in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AlgorithmOfTruth said:

What is the meaning of "line up" in the subway system? I looked up the meaning and found a general definition relating to directional orientation, e.g., northbound, or southbound, but what does it mean in relation to our system? I've heard conductors asking their partners, "Do you have the line up?" before moving out of the terminal, followed by a sequence of buzzers. Is it something related to the governance of movement? Maybe it's asked at times when the the exiting homeball is out of the conductor's field of vision, preventing them from closing up as they don't know if the train can proceed to the next station? I've wondered about this for awhile. Thanks for any clarifications in advance.

I’ve heard in operations of things like “Full lineup to Forest Hills” referencing having trains enter one after another 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone mentioned Money Problems and Spending Money Foolishly?

I was having a similar conversation with one of my maintainers the other day. IIRC, some incorrect measurements with the track or something delayed Culver CBTC by 2 years? Not to mention that Transit has a bunch of different systems all doing the same job or something like that. Same with QBL CBTC having issues on top of still being incomplete. 

On 12/11/2022 at 2:13 PM, Trainmaster5 said:

Just look at the DC Metro system right now. The same problems plaguing it too. Funding and equipment problems. There’s a stopgap funding mechanism for this year only and then it’s the (MTA) scenario for them. The government has always funded airports and highways to the detriment of public commuter systems. Those who live in the metropolitan areas like Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, DC, and Atlanta and use the systems are pitted against the highway users who don’t normally use the transit system and who resent being taxed for services they don’t use. New Yorkers know the game now.Being told that they must pay congestion pricing fees to fund a system that they don’t use. There’s gotta be a fairer, more equitable solution to the problem plaguing transit systems in the cities. I don’t know how this gets solved except for direct government funding and that’s never happened before in the past. Money is the problem, period. It’s always been the problem even when the private companies ran the system. Perhaps the public school funding mechanism is the way forward. My opinion. Carry on.


And it shouldn't have to be that way at all, although given this country's track record with Public Transport, I can't say I'm surprised.

On 12/11/2022 at 10:04 AM, darkstar8983 said:

Exactly: think of why OPTÓ wasn’t implemented permanently on the (L) - unions prevented the loss of those train operator and conductor Jobs. Think of why the Sandy Repairs to the (L) were as botched as they were? Former “Prince Cuomo” didn’t want a full shutdown and thought the extensive work could be done with night and weekend closures.

why hasn’t CBTC started up yet throughout the system? Dinero! (Money) 

Look where that's got us.

On the note of OPTO, those could've been jobs that could've be redistributed elsewhere, especially now with the Shortage of Crews. Although Staff shortages on the MoW side of things is worse atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2022 at 2:13 PM, Trainmaster5 said:

Just look at the DC Metro system right now. The same problems plaguing it too. Funding and equipment problems. There’s a stopgap funding mechanism for this year only and then it’s the (MTA) scenario for them. The government has always funded airports and highways to the detriment of public commuter systems. Those who live in the metropolitan areas like Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, DC, and Atlanta and use the systems are pitted against the highway users who don’t normally use the transit system and who resent being taxed for services they don’t use. New Yorkers know the game now.Being told that they must pay congestion pricing fees to fund a system that they don’t use. There’s gotta be a fairer, more equitable solution to the problem plaguing transit systems in the cities. I don’t know how this gets solved except for direct government funding and that’s never happened before in the past. Money is the problem, period. It’s always been the problem even when the private companies ran the system. Perhaps the public school funding mechanism is the way forward. My opinion. Carry on.

I don't understand this thinking, though. The people that "don't use" the system benefit from it. They should pay as well. Shut down mass transit, and gridlock everywhere; nobody goes anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is said that next year between 2023 and 2024, the Williamsburg Bridge will be shutdown for 25 weekends. Expect a change in travel and crowded B39 buses in the future. 
 

Saturdays and Sunday’s for (J)(M) lines 

Edited by Calvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.